Comments on: Things Michelle Malkin Doesn’t Get: Protesters

By: jason

jason — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:15:53 +0000

@BS Mcgee. You’re aren’t factoring in security costs in Bush’s inaugeration, which acutally cost $ 157 million at the end of the day. from media matters: , buried in a recent New York Times article published one week before the controversy erupted over the cost of Obama’s inauguration, the newspaper reported that in 2005, “the federal government and the District of Columbia spent a combined $115.5 million, most of it for security, the swearing-in ceremony, cleanup and for a holiday for federal workers” [emphasis added].

You read that correctly. The federal government spent $115 million dollars for the 2005 inauguration. Keep in mind, that $115 million price tag was separate from the money Bush backers bundled to put on the inauguration festivities. For that, they raised $42 million. So the bottom line for Bush’s 2005 inauguration, including the cost of security? That’s right, $157 million.”

By: BS Mcgee

BS Mcgee — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:53:10 +0000

Hey,

Crappy blog you’ve got here! I mean, you’ve really got that nose buried in Obama’s behind! Nothing more repulsive than a Demonicrat eagerly licking Obama’s boots. And they say there’s no cult of personality.

Here’s a hint, sherlock. Bush’s inaugural cost 45 mill. Obama’s is gonna cost 145.

And yet, 4 years ago, we had tools like you bleating and bitching about the cost of the inaugural. Hypocrite much?

Enjoy the clown you got elected – before he utterly destroys this country.

By: The Economy » Blog Archive » Things Michelle Malkin Doesn’T Get: Protesters - North is..

Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:13:29 +0000

[...] President Obama ’s Chicago machine is kicking into high gear to plan and fund his massive, unprecedented inaugural festivities. He just appointed an inauguration planning committee that includes his hometown cronies William Daley and …[Continue Reading] [...]